Workplace burnout: some strategies to prevent it

Irene Malcangi

COO

Burnout is no longer a marginal issue. According to the Censis-Eudaimon 2025 Report, 31.8% of Italian employees have experienced forms of burnout: exhaustion, emotional detachment, persistent negative feelings towards their work. Among under-35s, the figure rises to 47.7%, almost one worker in two.

We are not talking about simple tiredness. Burnout arises when work stress becomes chronic and is not managed. It shows up as difficulty concentrating, loss of motivation, irritability, sleep disturbances, a sense of ineffectiveness and a gradual detachment from work.

The point is clear: burnout is not just a personal issue. It is an organisational problem that shows up in people.

The warning signs are already visible

The data paint a picture far broader than the individual case. 76.8% of employees struggle to find a balance between private life and work. 75.9% feel overwhelmed by day-to-day responsibilities. 73.9% feel too much pressure at work and 73% have experienced work-related stress or anxiety in the past year.

These are figures that point to a structural problem: workloads that are hard to see, unclear priorities, constant expectations, little autonomy and insufficient support.

The most affected group is young workers. Almost half of under-35s experience symptoms of burnout. It is a generation entering the labour market with high expectations, but it often finds unclear structures, poor support and little real autonomy.

What workers really want

When we talk about corporate wellbeing, we tend to think straight away about benefits, meditation apps, yoga classes or one-off initiatives. But the data tell a different story.

Workers are asking first and foremost for time, balance and a more sustainable organisation. 89.4% would like more time for themselves, 86.2% more time for friends and family, 79% more time to truly rest.

Even the dimensions seen as most important for wellbeing are very concrete: good relationships with managers and colleagues, autonomy, work-life balance, flexibility, recognition. These are not expensive benefits. They are the result of how work is designed every day.

Burnout isn't solved after the fact

Many companies step in when the problem has already exploded: psychological support, wellbeing days, welfare initiatives. These are useful tools, but they are not enough if the work continues to be organised badly.

Burnout is prevented earlier. It is prevented by making the real workload visible, clarifying priorities, distributing responsibilities better and spotting signs of overload before they turn into a crisis.

Three levers are particularly important:

  1. making the real workload visible;

  2. giving more autonomy and flexibility in managing time;

  3. building a culture of support and recognition.

The issue is not only how much people work. It is how confusing, fragmented, unpredictable and unsustainable the work is.

Why work tools matter

The link between burnout and a work management system is not immediate, but it is central.

If a team works within systems full of disconnected tasks, unclear priorities, constant notifications and manual updates, the cognitive load increases. People do not just have to work: they also have to understand what matters, what is urgent, what has changed, who is blocked and what risks falling through the cracks.

An AI-native work management system can help right here: not by replacing people, but by making work easier to read.

It can make workload distribution visible before it turns into overload. It can reduce repetitive micro-decisions. It can filter out information noise. It can flag only what is truly urgent. It can help managers spot early signs of difficulty.

It is not a magic solution to burnout. But it can create healthier conditions: less chaos, less invisible work, less accumulated pressure.

Wellbeing starts with how work is organised

Burnout is not prevented by asking people to be more resilient within systems that drain them.

It is prevented by designing work better: clearer workloads, more legible priorities, real autonomy, visible support and tools that reduce complexity instead of adding more of it.

An AI-native work management system does not replace corporate wellbeing. It creates the conditions for it to be possible.